Often when I’m playing Scrabble, I’m testing every normally -ed word with the -t variant to see if I can make it fit, but only a small percentage of them gets accepted or is in the dictionary. Some seem self-explanatory, but others seem arbitrary, and feel like hangovers from an old mediaeval version of the language.

An example of a self-explanatory variation would be “burned” and “burnt”. One is the past particle of the verb to burn, the other is a description of the quality of having been burned. Although interchangeable, one generally feels more appropriate than the other in specific circumstances. I’m ok with that particular t/ed switcheroo. It’s stuff like the following that I’m confused about:

  • Vexed/Vext
  • Fixed/Fixt
  • Flocked/Flockt
  • Picked/Pickt
  • Skinned/Skint (borderline case, “skint” has another meaning)

Those are all in the dictionary, but these aren’t:

  • Backed/Backt
  • Racked/Rackt
  • Packed/Packt
  • Fucked/Fuckt

I can’t for the life of me figure out the rule, if such a rule even exists.

Cheers!

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I mean this is really dependent on the version of Scrabble you’re playing.

    That seems like a unique thing for your particular version. Like it’s including internetisms/slang.

    Some of those are actually legit words (like burnt); but some others are not.