• JASN_DE@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To the pure science itself yes, but not to the larger environment resp. individuals. That’s why there are usually checks in place.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      How can we have a proper double blind study if we are forced to tell the participants information that could impact the results of the study in order to gain informed consent?

        • Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          While I agree it does not invalidate the study because it is one of the gold standards, it is disingenuous to say that the information provided to gain informed consent in a double blind study has no impact on that study.

          • Bouchtroubouli@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You seem to think that a double blind study is to measure the effect of a medication against “no medication”, but it is, in fact, to measure effect against placebo. Double blind is specifically designed to remove experimentator effect in a full consent framework. In fact, the study that are not done with consent, generally in a single blind (the experimentated) are always frowned upon by the community for good reasons.

            • Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              You are missing the point and I won’t restate what was already stated explicitly.

              • Sidhean@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                “you’re wrong”

                “no?”

                “well you’re right but this new claim”

                “here’s why you’re wrong in detail”

                “you aren’t engaging with me. The time for conversation has passed. goodbye.”