• mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s equivalent to sovereign citizens. OP is the author of their comment and therefore has the copyrights. As the author one can license their work as all rights reserved or other permissive licenses.

    OP chooses to license their work as Creative Commons.

    They’re not forcing you to accept the license, it’s your local government that enforces copyright.

    The reason why this might work on Lemmy but not on corporate Social media is that corporate social media often have terms of service that require you to give them ownership/rights/etc. Lemmy has no such ToC.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The reason why this might work on Lemmy but not on corporate Social media is that corporate social media often have terms of service that require you to give them ownership/rights/etc. Lemmy has no such ToC.

      Actually, Safe Harbor laws would encompass social media sites as well, so it would work there as well.

      Either corporations own the content you post and are responsible for it, or they just host your content you post that you own and are immune from harm for the content. The law is currently the latter, and not the former.

      Also, law trumps ToS’s.

      This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0