TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoTIL shitposts can get Wikipedia pages if they're popular enoughen.m.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1112arrow-down1external-linkTIL shitposts can get Wikipedia pages if they're popular enoughen.m.wikipedia.orgTriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBaron Von J@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·1 month agoAnything can get a Wikipedia page if you can source the info, no?
minus-squarebonn2@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·1 month agoWikipedia does have rules requiring an amount of noteworthyness.
minus-squareTim_Bisley@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 month agoNo I was blocked repeatedly from creating Wikipedia articles about a few different Japanese computing magazines. The mods there said the topic didn’t merit an article.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 month agohow the fuck does a magazine available in stores not merit an article? absolute wankers
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·1 month agoIf you can source the info and pull the stick out of the editors’ asses about notoriety
Anything can get a Wikipedia page if you can source the info, no?
Wikipedia does have rules requiring an amount of noteworthyness.
No I was blocked repeatedly from creating Wikipedia articles about a few different Japanese computing magazines. The mods there said the topic didn’t merit an article.
how the fuck does a magazine available in stores not merit an article? absolute wankers
If you can source the info and pull the stick out of the editors’ asses about notoriety