I can see someone in the future watching a program run and asking “wow, is that ai? A PERSON typed those cryptic letters? No way!”

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 days ago

    “After all, it was one of the first sectors to deploy A.I. programming in the 1980s, with the four ghosts who chase Pac-Man each responding differently to the player’s real-time movements.”

    All the lines look blurry when you’re squinting at things from a position of complete ignorance.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      In the not too distant future…

      NPC: “ChatGPT told me I got ghosts in my blood and I better inject bleach bout it”

      AI Corpo: “thankfully, no human programmed it to respond with that, so we are not liable”

      Fascist court: “NPC’s family must pay AI Corpo damages for negative publicity”

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      yeah, we should talk about “probabilistic” vs. “deterministic” behavior instead.

      all programs are somewhat intelligent. that’s why computers were originally built, after all, to do a part of our workload. If they were completely stupid, we wouldn’t really use any computers at all, so yes, intelligence is a necessary feature of every program. the question is whether it has well-defined deterministic behavior or not.