Damn

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    All surveys are flawed. Quantitative social science is a rats-nest of scams, schemes, and popularity contests. If you like that kind of thing.

    • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Like I said there are issues. No survey can completely get the perfect picture but as long as we do not read out the brains of every person on the planet, methodically good social sciences are the best apprpximation we have.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        methodically good social sciences are the best apprpximation we have.

        Yes and No. In many cases, the methodology is questionable at best and the results become a part of “settled science” which - unless you’re talking specifically to academics and researchers - is highly problematic.

        Should we do nothing then? In many cases - yes. Which sort of illustrates the problem in another way - if we had nothing to say we’d just make something up right? Well, instead of doing that if we have nothing to say we run some polls or surveys and find something to say in them. That’s a huge problem. (Admittedly that’s less to do with social science than media, but the Venn diagram of the two is ugly.)

        • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          When talking about science I mean science and nothing else. Clear, good methodologies, peer reviews etc. Random street polls etc. are trash and surveys between science and street polls vary across a broad spectrum.