VirtualBox is ridiculously simple to set up and get virtual machines going. Shared folders, shared clipboard and much more are no issue.

But.

It eats resources. The installed virtual machines (VM) run relatively slow. What have you found to be feature comparable - and most importantly more resource-efficient - alternatives for running VMs under Linux?

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Virt-manager with qemu-system, although if you use the kvm driver for both performance should be about the same I think.

    Don’t forget virtualbox has a lot of configuration options that may improve performance, Ive never had a problem with it but also never need high performance from a VM.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Might be that you really don’t need VMs but just lightweight namespace containers. If so, you can use docker/podman, systemd-nspawn or various other tools. The overhead will be less than 1% if you stay within the same architecture as your host.

    https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-nspawn

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Under Linux, the recommended route is KVM/Qemu, with Virt-Manager as the GUI front-end for them. You will need to follow tutorials to install it correctly, as it requires special steps, e.g. adding them to specific usergroups. But once it works, it works well.

    • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree. The only feature where I’d say it’s weaker feature-wise is it doesn’t have any form of virtual GPU acceleration - either you deal with software rendering or have to pass through a graphics card (I’ve done it, but it’s not easy.).

      Otherwise, I’d say it tends to run better than VirtualBox, though it’s been years since I last used Vbox anyhow. A plus is Virt Manager comes in most distro repos, whereas VirtualBox doesn’t. Also, it allows you to directly edit the XML, so you can do some cool stuff that would be really annoying (not impossible) to do in VirtualBox.

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        actually, you can do vulkan passthrough if the guest machine is also linux

  • Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    virt-manager is my go-to. There’s also Gnome Boxes, but I’ve never used it myself. virt-manager is the best I’ve tried, personally. Both use KVM, so they should be much more resource efficient

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Definitely if you’re on Linux, use Qemu (and the best is to install a GUI to use it after)

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Really wish we could get in the habit of recommending GUIs first, not last.

      • Einar@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Really wish we wouldn’t have to separate the two. This adds a complication layer for exiting Windows users.

        Ideally: install app (insert name). Run and enjoy.