I say that because some towers are leaning weirdly, and some windows are very diffused. It’s too low res to be to an “artistic renderin,” and it’s just looks messy (as an image). I’ve seen better renders of the towers of Bologna.
If it’s not AI, I’ll across out the top bir. I’m sorry I’m just super skeptical nowadays.
Pretty sure it’s just a close-up photo of this model reconstruction from 1917. This article contains a higher-res version of the photo where you can see that it’s just the roughly painted model houses making it look somewhat AI-like.
Is this an AI image? Stop that.
I say that because some towers are leaning weirdly, and some windows are very diffused. It’s too low res to be to an “artistic renderin,” and it’s just looks messy (as an image). I’ve seen better renders of the towers of Bologna.
If it’s not AI, I’ll across out the top bir. I’m sorry I’m just super skeptical nowadays.
I’m sure it’s an aerial image from that time
Yea that’s why it’s low rez, the government pigeons were still in development
It appears to be a wooden model. The image appeared in this blog post from 2022. At the end of the blog post, there is the wooden model. https://thepastabbatical.substack.com/p/the-towers-of-bologna
Pretty sure it’s just a close-up photo of this model reconstruction from 1917. This article contains a higher-res version of the photo where you can see that it’s just the roughly painted model houses making it look somewhat AI-like.
Yeah linking to a Wikipedia article.But throwing in random AI art is frustrating. This picture is not on the Wikipedia page.
deleted by creator