• Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well yeah, if you have custom or exotic hardware you either customize an existing OS or write one from scratch. First option is much more sensible.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      “Custom” and “Exotic” is a thing of the past. Been there, used that. It didn’t have Linux, either.

      Nowadays, it’s more or less stock PCs (with high-end specs for CPU, RAM, GPU, etc), but nothing that would not run a common OS. They would probably even run Windows.

      What it makes special is clustering.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You are right, and yes, they could run Windows, but it’d be pretty silly.

        All the applications they run were written with a pure POSIX mindset, the jobs are run headless, and the legacy of much of the application code dates back to before even Windows NT was a thing.

        In the late 2000s, Microsoft actually made a concerted push to try to get into the market, and it was just a laughable failure (they brought nothing to the table, had reduced ecosystem compatibility, and tried to charge more all in the process.

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Supercomputers are not made of custom or exotic hardware. They are large clusters of high end servers.