such as like this:
The concept of gender identity is said to be real as an experience, (like how theists claim to see god [a claim basically]), but scientifically under-defined, weakly grounded biologically, and sometimes treated as more fixed or explanatory than current evidence justifies.
I mean as opposed to ideological reasoning. Natural reasoning is a conclusion that I can come up without any form of ideology or worldview.
Explain the “third thing?” It would really help considering my whole comment is about how I cannot rationalise a third position.
If gender is man-made, I don’t see what positive purpose it serves.