That’s such a small number. I bet there might be one or two near you even. You can just Google it!

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    100% over a billion

    million
    fine, I’ll settle for 10 million

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, a flat amount will never work. Make it a multiple of some figure, like average wage. That way it actually changes with inflation and we don’t have a situation where the the inflation adjusted minimum wage is 6 times the actual federal minimum wage.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Make it so that if poor people earn more, the rich pay less taxes… Or something, that might actually not function.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Ya, that seems reasonable.

          I think it’s a pretty core democratic value that no person is worth more than another. A compromise of 1 million times should satisfy individuals with even the most acute case of wealth hoarding.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yeah, I’m willing to comprise for a realistic solution to the billionaire problem.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m fine letting people have 100m. It’s really a drop in the bucket compared to the folks who have 1,000 times more than them. Definitely down to tax everything past that.