• Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Mississippi is subject to the same funding standards as every other state, and is miles behind everyone else. What they choose to do with that money locally is what is affecting outcomes, and it’ll be that way as long as curriculum and standards are set at the local and state level.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’m not arguing that state and local levels don’t have any impact. There’s no doubt that they do, but imagine if federal funding was double or triple what it is now. The outcomes could be so much better, even in places like MS where the government is actively working against its people.

      Edit: I also agree with where you seemed to be heading, which is that there should be some national minimums both or education content and how funding is spent.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        blanket federal funding wouldnt mean shit to the bottom states, it would just be ratfucked into the local robber barons coffers like everything else is currently.

        fixing mississippi starts by removing the slavers-sons running the state like it’s their personal piggybank, same for pretty much all former slave states.