early_riser@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 7 hours agoMosaics are analog pixel artmessage-squaremessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down12
arrow-up160arrow-down1message-squareMosaics are analog pixel artearly_riser@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 7 hours agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-square9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 hours agoFWIW, pixels don’t have to be square or in a grid. Some professional cameras take photos with hexagonal pixels, for example
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 hours ago FWIW, pixels don’t have to be square or in a grid. Are autochrome starch particles subpixels? How many are there in a pixel? Some professional cameras take photos with hexagonal pixels, for example Really? I thought the Bayer filter was near-universal, and Wikipedia does not list what you just mentioned. Anyway, older LCDs in portable color TVs, cameras and camcorders did use that pattern but that’s on the display side.
minus-square9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoYou prompted me to look it up and my knowledge is apparently a bit dated on that one I’d apparently read about Fujifilm doing this with some of their older CCD based sensors and they shifted away from that ages ago!
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoSo they probably didn’t output .raw images, I think those are more recent. That would have been a weird use of the file format!
minus-square9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoApparently they did have a raw format called RAF and the processing involved “demosaicing” funnily enough given the thread we are in
FWIW, pixels don’t have to be square or in a grid.
Some professional cameras take photos with hexagonal pixels, for example
Are autochrome starch particles subpixels? How many are there in a pixel?
Really? I thought the Bayer filter was near-universal, and Wikipedia does not list what you just mentioned.
Anyway, older LCDs in portable color TVs, cameras and camcorders did use that pattern but that’s on the display side.
You prompted me to look it up and my knowledge is apparently a bit dated on that one
I’d apparently read about Fujifilm doing this with some of their older CCD based sensors and they shifted away from that ages ago!
So they probably didn’t output .raw images, I think those are more recent. That would have been a weird use of the file format!
Apparently they did have a raw format called RAF and the processing involved “demosaicing” funnily enough given the thread we are in