It should go
4:20:59
4:20:60
4:20:61
4:20:62
4:20:63
4:20:64
4:20:65
4:20:66
4:20:67
4:20:68
4:20:69 Nice
4:21:10

  • vane@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yeah but isn’t it cheaper and less error prone to put only 6 bit counters instead of maintaining 5 bit counter stockpile in the factory ? Maybe it’s all robots right now so it doesn’t matter.

    • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It can be, although the example I’ve given where each counter is a discrete part is probably no longer the case. It’s likely that larger ICs which encompass all the requisite functionality can do the job, at lower cost than individual parts.

      But those ICs probably can’t do 4:20:69, so I didn’t bother mentioning that.