• sakuraba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah because saving money as an individual is the same as a company choosing to not pay copyright holders so they can make more profit from pirating petabytes of info

    Very clever, you are clearly very intelligent

    Let me put an /s just so this doesn’t go over your head too

    • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Company is run by individuals.

      I have no idea why you need to start insulting me now.

      • srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Despite being run by individuals I think there’s at least some amount of difference between pirating a book to read it and pirating all books in existance to make copius amount of profits.

        Not arguing for any moral superiority here, just pointing the difference.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          But in both cases you have the option to pay - yet choose not to. If money wasn’t an issue, there wouldn’t really be any reason to pirate anything. That’s why I see piracy as a financial decision, and thus I don’t think piracy advocates have any ground to stand on when they criticize AI companies for doing the exact same thing. It’s not identical, but it’s equivalent.

          One could even argue that individual piracy is selfish because it only benefits the one person doing it. AI companies at least are providing a product that hundreds of millions of people get value out of - and the vast majority of them get it for free.