• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was the late 1800’s. Dumb shit wasn’t in short supply in the world.

      Problem is, I could also see Trump’s WWE education secretary pushing for this in 2026.

      • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly in terms of late 1800s engineering, pi = 3.2 is accurate within 2% it’s not that scandalous

      • orlyowl@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes I was fully expecting the details to be “It was a Republican-sponsored bill in 1992” or similar. It’s just too damn believable.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I sort of get NIST doing something like this. I think even NASA rounds pi to 8 digits since that gets them within a diameter of a hydrogen atom.

        The purpose of NIST is not necessarily accuracy but consistency.