cm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down11cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
arrow-up178arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comcm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
minus-squareVenia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 days agowth does “without intent” mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
minus-squarecm0002@europe.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 days agoIntent meaning they’re not an ISP that caters to piracy E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad
wth does “without intent” mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
Intent meaning they’re not an ISP that caters to piracy
E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad