• early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I agree 100%. They just escaped the old forest and haven’t encountered the Barrow Wights. It’s a nice interlude in between. I often go back just to read that section.

    People argue that Bombadil isn’t well explained and comes out of nowhere, but I think if you put LOTR against the myths it was emulating it makes sense. The fact nobody knows who he is, including Gandalf, who was around for Arda’s creation, adds depth to the worldbuilding.

    I think he’s more anchored in the story than people think, too. They explicitly mention him at the council of Elrond, and explain why he’d be a bad ring bearer despite the ring not affecting him.

    One of my English classes in college focused on remakes and retellings, and I wrote an essay comparing the books to the films. HOnestly can’t remember what I wrote but when I told the professor what I was writing about the first thing she said was “You’re going to say why they cut Tom Bombadil?”

    • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tom’s incongruity is entirely deliberate. Tolkien worked out Middle Earth in meticulous detail, but thought that a truly believable mythology needed to have a few mysteries, hence Tom.

      • Xenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Ironically cutting him out of the movies like this sort of adds to his mythology