And that has always completely baffled me. What’s the reasoning behind it? Why?
Are they delusional? Do they consider themselves somehow special?
If something has 99%+ chance of failure, theres absolutely no point to evne try or consider it as something that can happen, it’s basically a statistical anomaly.
We crave validation from others and ourselves by being considered “rare” or capable of creating “rarity” in an ocean of mediocrity and banality to justify our state, choices, and attitudes. We consider “rarity” as inherently valuable and a virtue to aspire to.
And that has always completely baffled me. What’s the reasoning behind it? Why? Are they delusional? Do they consider themselves somehow special? If something has 99%+ chance of failure, theres absolutely no point to evne try or consider it as something that can happen, it’s basically a statistical anomaly.
We crave validation from others and ourselves by being considered “rare” or capable of creating “rarity” in an ocean of mediocrity and banality to justify our state, choices, and attitudes. We consider “rarity” as inherently valuable and a virtue to aspire to.
Makes sense. I wouldn’t say being mediocre is bad, but each to their own.
“Mediocrity” (sort of) implies “middling”, etymologically, which is what most people are. Average.
Reminds me of some lyrics by the Foo Fighters, “There goes my hero; he’s ordinary.”
Something being rare doesn’t make it inherently mediocre.
Because it’s fun. And if it does happens, cuz they may be low odds but they aren’t zero, is something worth telling others about.
Odds and stakes are different, for one
deleted by creator