• OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      and why is it mandatory?

      Some companies’ C-suites have gotten their heads so far up their asses on AI that they’ve entirely forgotten about making money and the only metric they care about now is whether their company is using AI more than their competitors.

      It’s no longer about ‘how do we use AI to make money?’ – it’s about ‘how can we spend money to increase AI usage?’

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        LLM seem magic if you don’t have expertise in an area. Middle management and above don’t have any technical expertise in their domain do they love the 40% (a bit worse than the 80-20 rule) that LLM enable.

        Report: “Project is delayed because we are fixing a deadlock issue” Mgmt to LLM: “My project is delayed because of deadlock issue. What should I do?” LLM: “Oxidise your codebase and use Rust” Mgmt to team: “We should stop writing in C++ and use Rust 100%” Le Team has no rust experience and a 15 year old codebase in C++

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          The “sycophantic overconfident oracle” tone the biggest companies deliberately give LLMs has to be one of the most problematic single decisions of the century.

          Multi-turn, decoder-only LLMs are neat tools in the ML toolbox, but oracles are not what they are.

          But now that it’s stuck, that perception is going to fuck shit up in management hierarchies forever.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I was only saying I was worried it might become mandatory in the future.

      But I’m pretty certain my employer will establish a corporate account with Microsoft for Copilot whereby my employer’s employees get the premium Copilot “features” (I use the term loosely) by logging in to Copilot using their employee credentials through some SSO integration between the two companies. And then Microsoft will probably provide usage data on a per-employee basis to my employer.

      My employer has a setup almost exactly like this with at least one other SaaS provider. The one I’m thinking of isn’t an LLM provider like Copilot. But my employer has made it clear that a) they’re monitoring usage by employees and b) usage (to the tune of a certain number of hours per week) is mandatory.