• moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I obviously reject the original framing and was really hoping to hear your answer. That a system supports a life you find worthwhile does not mean it is inherently worth supporting.

    • amne@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      That a system supports a life you find worthwhile does not mean it is inherently worth supporting.

      That’s not the claim made in op. Op makes exactly 0 claims on what kind of life one SHOULD think is worthwhile, or what kind of system SHOULD be. The point is that it’s on the reader to figure out for themselves. Again, you input your own values into the framework.

      You define what kind of life is worthwhile.

      You support a system that you KNOW enables it.

      It would NOT make sense to NOT support a system that enables it.

      • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You’re lost in the sauce man, high on your own supply, huffing your own farts. If you aren’t intentionally misinterpreting what I said you’re dumb as hell. I’m here to understand and communicate, not mud wrassle, and it’s no fun trying to spoonfeed each word to someone so dense and/or hostile. You’re obnoxious enough I’d rather just touch grass, so call that a “win” if you’d like and thank you for getting me off the screen