• TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The car from the 70’s survives accidents better because more of it is rigid, but this makes it more dangerous as more of the force of the accident is transferred to the driver.

    Modern crumple zones are placed intentionally so that while the car will crumple, the driver will not.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If I have to pick only one, I’m going to go with modern crumple zones

      But man, I do wish we had some kind of magical smart metal that could be as rigid as an old car for low speed collisions, but still crumple for more serious impacts.

      Because when you drive an old shitbox like I do, pretty much any damage is enough to total it, and having to get a new car really sucks when the accident was minor enough that no one was going to get hurt anyway.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Get EV. Make it do the skateboard design idea where the chassis/drive train is a skateboard under the cabin/cargo body. Delete the bolts that join the halves, replace with bungee cords. Done.

        I had a toy car at some point that had plunger bumpers that reversed motor direction on impact.