• BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    When my school was hit by a natural disaster, I had the opportunity to switch from a premier Catholic school to a premier public school for two semesters.

    …let me tell you, the biggest disservice that you received was a systematic lowering of academic standards. The difference was night and day. There is no way that that curriculum was preparing students for college.

    Since there is a limited window in which brain plasticity is at its peak, catching up at university isn’t an option. Public school students are at a permanent disadvantage; it’s an equal opportunity problem.

    • TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      With sufficiently motivated people, it can happen. I tutored people in a small community college for a semester. It was the most rewarding job I’ve ever had.

      Honestly it was mostly single moms that never understood algebra in high school but needed to pass their nursing degree requirements. When it clicked, and the light shone in their eyes, it felt like a personal success. I wish it paid better because I’d love to do it forever

  • innermachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The public school system was sort of ultimately designed to make good little obedient factory line workers. Not a surprise at all, they want you to think it’s a thing of the past and get complacent. How do you think we got where we are today?

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The only thing I am glad my US Public School education gave me were a few history teachers who directly talked about politics, activism, and repeatedly getting arrested for protesting the School of the Americas.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Born around 1985 here and…same.

      I think the biggest disservice regarding the Civil Rights era is talking up MLK every year…and not once mentioning Malcom X or the Black Panthers.

      MLK would have accomplished nothing if the alternative wasn’t them.

      It paints the picture that hippies and marches are all that’s needed. It’s not. The oppressors need to feel unsafe.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, it’s interesting that the curriculum starts by portraying the American revolution as a just and righteous war, with ragtag bands of freedom fighters going up against a brutal and overwhelmingly powerful oppressor… And then as soon as the revolution is concluded, the messaging takes a hard turn to “but also violence is never okay and peaceful protest is the only acceptable way to instigate change!”

        In the chapters about the civil rights era, Malcom X and the Black Panthers were barely mentioned in a footnote. And only really as a “oh also not all people were peaceful, and that violence only hurt the protestors’ message” warning.

        And the sad part is that the propaganda works. Every time some politically-charged violence happens, you inevitably have people in the comments chanting about how violence is never the answer, and peaceful protest is the only acceptable way to change things.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well it is.
    They are called boomers now and blamed for everything despite of the things they did.

    • Identikit@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      While the movement is piece of the past, I would argue that the fight for equal rights continues to this day.

      What you said thought doesn’t add up to my knowledge though — Civil Rights was fought for roughly from 1950-1960s. The Civil Rights Act was signed in 1964 when Boomers were turning 18 and the last year of their generation. This would mean that the people in the streets protesting and/or voting weren’t boomers but the silent generation and their parents.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        That is indeed your limited knowledge.
        If you want to cherrypick one thing (1964).
        There was still a lot to do and done after that.
        Vietnam after that for one.
        Black Panters didn’t even exist.

        Also, ‘the fight for equal rights continues to this day’

        It should but it doesn’t really.
        A lot of complaining and embarrassingly weak and lame stuff.
        Looks like the regime won and the population has been pacified.

        • SippyCup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          If you’re going to troll from overseas you aught to work on your English a bit. I’d suggest reading up on your American history too but it’s pretty clear that’s not super important to whatever message it is you think you’re sending.

    • taygaloocat@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      But the boomers to this day continue to vote for corrupt governments and fall for such blatant government lies and deception

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        25 -29 only had a 10% difference for Copmala.
        Everyone older was equal or pro Orange.
        But if it makes you feel better about your ageism towards a generation that actually fought for something while current generations are an embarrassment, go ahead.
        I don’t live in the US shithole so IDC.
        In fact, if they’re dumb enough to fall for divide and conquer tricks and not direct their anger at the guilty ones you deserve what you get and I’m glad that cancer country is going to shit…

  • wakko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You were also likely taught that the genocide of indigenous Americans was a past event, too.

    I have met people who did not realize that indigenous Americans still exist.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It certainly was shocking to find an active ongoing eugenics program was still active in the 1970’s.

      The reality of people existing in active oppression by the US government is absolutely not the impression that I got.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    For me, it was that protesting was only ever discussed as peaceful, civil activity, as was a way of communicating demands outside of the voting cycle.

    Unionization and workers rights were never discussed. I didn’t learn about unions as a concept until nearly graduation when my first job had so much required training about how dangerous they were, and of course I assumed they were full of it and did my own investigation.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      It always bugs me a little when Labor Day rolls around and people just kind of ignore how workers’ rights were literally fought and died for, but as you said, they don’t teach us about Blair Mountain or Haymarket Square on purpose.

      And who was basically always on the wrong side?

      The US military.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Checks and balances in the federal government is my biggest disappointment. They aren’t working.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In the same vein as the first comment, you were also likely taught that slavery ended in the 19th century with the end of the Civil War.

    • I actually had a teacher that pointed out the 13th amendment prison exemption.

      She was also a black muslim, as in actually wearing a hijab. (the point of this being that it was diverse af and not just white teachers)

      Also focused a lot on COINTELPRO and the spying on civil right leaders that type of stuff.

      And the Jim Crow stuff, sharecropping… etc…

      Also that the emancipation proclamation itself probably did not free any enslaved people, since they only applied to rebelling states, which would obviously ignore it.

      (Philly btw… my school was rated so bad btw… like 2/10 on the greatschool .org thing lots of fightings and stuff, the point being that its not some rich neighborhood)

      But they taught almost nothing about Asian Americans… :(

      Just a brief mention and that’s all, probably why racism towards Asian Americans are still so common and still socially acceptable… :(

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        But they taught almost nothing about Asian Americans… :(

        Same. Except for the Japanese Internment Camps…which was covered in English Lit for some reason.

        As far as my high school history curriculum went, Asia , South America, and most of Africa simply did not exist. Africa only got mentioned for Egypt and slave-trade. South America because of the conquistadors and stopping there.