• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Not a good take. People don’t have to be driving to benefit from roads. Deliveries, emergency access, routing for utilities

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is also a poor take. “Benefit” is not a binary state. What if we treated, say, water the same way? That is, you pay the local water utility a connection fee, and the water is free. There’d be no penalty, no incentive not to have a waterfall feature in your front yard fed by the tap. What would happen to water usage?

      The same thing that happens with “free” use of roads and streets—the tragedy of the commons. They fill to overcapacity daily.