• flabberjabber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    But there’s a third option. There’s a difference between complete absence of this topic in the curriculum, and simplified versions of it that increase in difficulty with capability. Mirroring other stages of educational development.

    At the moment there’s a complete absence. At least in any country I’m aware of. Until late high school level which is way too late.

    Young kds understand hierarchies. Social hierarchies start to form on the first day of kindergarten.

    Teaching an 8 year old that science research sits at the top of a pyramid and newspapers and TV sitd at the bottom, would be easy to grasp. There’s nothing stopping us removing the detail and teaching a simplified structure that can then be built upon in subsequent years.

    Edit: in regards to your edit, I was taught a simplified scientific method from age 8, not 12.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Teaching an 8 year old that science research sits at the top of a pyramid and newspapers and TV sitd at the bottom, would be easy to grasp.

      you have never been around children, have you?

      • flabberjabber@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If kid is capable of understanding basic scientific method at 8 years old, they can understand the basic structure of a hierarchy.

        “X is more important than Y”

        “Why sir”

        “Because X uses the scientific method like we discussed in class last week and Y does not”

        “What’s the scientific method again sir”

        repeats for retention