I run dnstools.ws which lets you perform DNS lookups, pings, traceroutes, etc. from 25 locations around the world. Each location is powered by a VPS running Debian, running a C# service that’s compiled to native code ahead-of-time using Native AOT. It uses ~60MB RAM.

Six of the the locations are powered by tiny “NAT VPSes” (native IPv6 with shared NAT IPv4) that only cost a few dollars a year, sponsored by various server providers. These usually have 256 MB RAM and 4-5 GB disk space.

This is great with OpenVZ and LXC. Since they’re containers that share the kernel with the host, kernel memory doesn’t count towards the container’s memory limit. I’m using ~75 MB RAM on those systems: ~60MB for the DNSTools worker and ~15MB for everything else (sshd, systemd, cron, rsyslogd, and unattended-upgrades). Plenty of room left.

I also have a few KVM systems with 256 MB RAM. These are what I’m struggling with.

Debian 13 (Trixie) increased the minimum hardware requirements from 256 MB to 512 MB RAM. It seems like this is a hard requirement - When running on a system using 256 MB RAM, the installer complains about having too little RAM, and OOMs during the installation. Even with a successful installation (e.g. upgrading from bookworm to trixie), it kernel panics on boot: “System is deadlocked on memory”.

I could try debootstrap to bootstrap a basic system, or Clonezilla to clone a working disk image over the network, but I think I’d hit the memory deadlock too.

Does Debian have smaller kernel images for VM environments, that use less RAM? Or should I just give up on Debian for this use case?

Does anyone have a recommendation for another distro I should use? I’ve been considering trying Alpine. C# does support compiling to use musl instead of glibc, so that’s not an issue. I’m also not tightly-coupled to systemd and can get rid of it.

I can mount a custom ISO on the systems, so booting from an ISO isn’t an issue.

Thanks!

Edit: Alpine looks very promising - no issue installing it and running my app on a 256MB VM. This is probably what I’ll end up using.

  • dan@upvote.auOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Even if I avoid the installer (e.g. by cloning an existing system, or by installing an older version of Debian then upgrading it), and have swap space, the kernel hits a memory deadlock on boot. I suspect it’s deadlocking before swap is initialized.

    • Ralph Rönnquist@mastodon.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      @dan @RIotingPacifist A “normal” debian starts by unpacking the initrd, which is into ram, so you’d need enough to cover that, plus initial runtime. Most likely you will need to tailor your initrd; i.e. go non-standard.

      • dan@upvote.auOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        That’s what I was thinking. I might try the cloud kernel (linux-image-cloud-amd64). It only has drivers required for VM platforms, so maybe the initramfs might be smaller? Otherwise I could build a custom one with just the things I need (only ext4 and swap, only drivers for KVM, etc).

        I’m trying Alpine as well, which looks promising.