• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They’re less ugly than a jersey barrier and do less damage to cars that can’t stay in their lane while still protecting cyclists.

    But yeah, visibility is key. I wonder if they are still visible in ten years. That’s my only objection to things like raised crossings: once the paint wears off or in snow they become a lot less visible and no longer as effective. I hate that both as a driver and a cyclist

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is mostly a US problem though. Road designers in the US just don’t seem to actually understand how to implement these things in a sensible manner.

      The way to do things like raised crossings is to make them out of a different type of road surface, moving over to brick pavers is common, so there’s always a visual indication.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        Yeah we don’t spend money on road maintenance, only road creation