TheViking@nord.pub to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoIs it possible to have an internet without the Javascript ?message-squaremessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up139arrow-down15
arrow-up134arrow-down1message-squareIs it possible to have an internet without the Javascript ?TheViking@nord.pub to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarebrax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·16 hours agoYeah? It wouldn’t be as flashy looking but it would be far more secure and far less system-heavy. Would also be great if our browsers didn’t report every little detail about our PC too… Time to go back to BBSing.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours ago It wouldn’t be as flashy looking What, why not?
minus-squareTheButtonJustSpins@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoJavaScript is how most of the fancy stuff happens. Sites would be a lot more static without it.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoBut most of JavaScript use is as a brittle replacement for CSS and HTML features, aside Ajax.
minus-squarebrax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoUnless I’m mistaken, JavaScript handles most of the event listeners and dynamic actions on websites… I suppose there is PHP and ASP doing a bit of that too, but I think most of it is JS
Yeah? It wouldn’t be as flashy looking but it would be far more secure and far less system-heavy.
Would also be great if our browsers didn’t report every little detail about our PC too…
Time to go back to BBSing.
What, why not?
JavaScript is how most of the fancy stuff happens. Sites would be a lot more static without it.
But most of JavaScript use is as a brittle replacement for CSS and HTML features, aside Ajax.
Unless I’m mistaken, JavaScript handles most of the event listeners and dynamic actions on websites… I suppose there is PHP and ASP doing a bit of that too, but I think most of it is JS