Whenever I talk to any Democrat supporters, they by-default cheer their Presidents and then I’ve to remind them of their leader’s illegal wars and war crimes. They condemn those acts and they go back to their cheerleading role - Why do they keep forgetting atrocities committed by their leaders? Why do they accept war criminals as their leader?

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There was already an economic war on Iran, which was already killing people and destabilizing their government. Harris would have waited a few more years for the economic war to collapse Iran’s government and turn it into a situation similar to Syria, and only then would have started bombing. By then, Iran might not have been able to exert control over traffic through Hormuz.

    Harris would have been a better manager of the empire. Instead, we got Trump, who is on track to lose to Iran.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t think you know what that means.

        Accelerationism would mean voting for Harris because she’d be a better manager of the empire.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No. Wanting Trump to win is accelerationist because he’s going to cause the empire to fall faster due to incompetence.

          You aren’t angry at Democrats for war crimes, you’re angry at them because they are better at governing.