In the 1980 election, Reagan won 44 states. Only 6 voted for Carter. In the 1984 election he won 49 states.

That’s the kind of landslide tRump has wet dreams about.

But it also reminds me of other countries like Russia, when they have an “Election”, and then the standing dictator wins 95% of the vote. It’s then an open secret that the vote was tampered with, but who’s going to stop it?

The 1980 and 1984 elections have that same vibe to them.

And the policies he enacted are the reason the usa are a shithole now. Reagan is like the original OG corrupt profits over people president.

Are we SUUUUURE those elections were legit?

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The bigger deal was that, for the elections from Nixon’s second term to Reagan’s second term, there wasn’t a major Democratic base in a state which varied differently from the nation. Bill Clinton had a near equivalent percentage of the vote in 1996 yet lost 19 states.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There was a major collapse of the Democratic Party in 1968 which never really recovered until Obama: Carter got elected because of Watergate, Bill Clinton got elected because of Perot.

    And bad as it looks in retrospect, Nixon and Reagan were very popular presidents at the time.

  • Elting@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    You’re forgetting the power of real charisma. The only candidate since that has come close to Reagan levels of rizz is Obama. Just you wait till Harris V Vance in 2028, watching two of the least charismatic people on the planet run a race to wield the power of a dying empire should be fun.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Elections generally tilt one way or the other based on fractions of a percentage of the vote, in fact, a single vote can be the difference.

    So, if two candidates are evenly matched, it’s possible that a whole state can go one way or the other based on just a few votes.

    Note that this is not specific to the USA and I’m in Australia.

    As far as “elections” go where there’s only one choice, that’s not an election but a dictatorship and from where I’m standing, the USA is heading in that direction at a breakneck speed.