• Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      There was never an actual notion of “security through obscurity”. LInux runs the complete Internet and most coporate server infrastructure. That’s where the actual money is.

      People hallucinating that Linux is something obscure simply have no clue and confused their home desktop for real computing. Windows desktops are constantly targeted not because they are -unlike Linux- so wide-spread but because they are already insanely insecure. They are the low hanging fruit where you can cobble together some cheap shit and will still find million of PCs vulnerable. If you want to find a Linux comparison it’s definitely not server or desktops but cheap IoT devices not having seen an update (or any security to speak of) for many years.

      For reference: We are talking about guest in a virtual pc excaping it’s container. That’s not something obcure. That’s basically all cloud hoster’s whole business model, thus the reason Google pays a lot of money for finding such exploits.

      • egregiousRac@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Windows desktops are targeted because any place you have a user, you have a vulnerability. The vast majority of Linux installs are servers with extremely limited user activity, which narrows the attack vectors significantly.

    • Clearwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Security through what now?

      Well, I guess it is obscure… Though only because the number of people who have a full grasp on how the code works is highly limited.