Thoughts on this?

    • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      It’s not really Fdroid complying so much as the developers signing the apps having registered with Google. Fdroid itself is unaffected by it except for having to sign their appstore binary. But they definitely are championing the side of the FOSS developer that’s traditionally been their supplier, and it’s how it’s going to affect those devs that they’re (rightly) up in arms on behalf.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It would increase visibility of F-Droid (people that might have never heard of it might start seeing it in the Play Store) so I think they’ll give in to Google’s requirements even if they oppose them…

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It would require either every app developer on F-Droid to comply as well, or for F-Droid to implement google play style app signing, both of which ive seen F-Droid maintainers being against.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        That’s a separate thing. As far as I know, there’ll be no difference between third-party app stores installed via Google Play vs third-party app stores installed via APK in terms of the apps in the store itself.

        IIRC they’re going to force verification for all apps but have an opt-out that you just need to do once, and wait 24 hours after enabling it.