Summary

  • 73% of Flathub apps labeled as “AI Slop” were abandoned within months.
  • Many were deleted or received no updates after release.
  • Analysis suggests the Flathub app AI ban helped spare reviewers and curb quick abandonware.
  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I agree that AI slop is bad, but I don’t really agree with their method of determining if an app is abandoned (no updates in 2-3 months).

    Sometimes apps don’t need updates. Some Linux apps don’t receive major updates for years. I used backupninja (https://0xacab.org/liberate/backupninja) for long time even though sometimes there’s 2-3 years between releases, because it did what I needed. (I switched to Borgmatic at some point though).

    I didn’t update one of my apps for over a year because it already did everything I needed, and I wasn’t receiving any major feature requests. There’s still some bugs I need to fix but I just haven’t gotten around to it yet.

    • oats@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I update my whole complete Linux box like twice a year. Thrice when I’m bored.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      These were new applications and so we can assume over time they need updates. Or at least it shows how much interested developers are working on it. It would also be nice to have a random sample size of similar applications without the Ai to have a comparison how often they get updated.