I think about this but like, I’m not sure if it’s a stupid question so I’ll put it here.

  • bookie@quokk.auOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s true. Every living organism could be conscious on some level if you think about it.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      If you’d like to go all the way down this rabbit hole there’s panpsychism, which posits that consciousness is a continuous scale with “zero” literally being down in the elementary particles. So even a single molecule is not quite zero on the scale, having an extremely minuscule degree of consciousness to it.

      I actually kind of like this because it means we don’t have to try to put that zero point at some other arbitrary location.

    • phaedral@beige.party
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      @bookie @gedaliyah And rivers and crystals are alive, if you define “alive” broadly enough.

      What, then, makes a given definition useful? True?

      What does it mean to be conscious?