I meant no suggestion of a negative aspect towards floozihood, I have drunk cider with many such in my life I only noted my comprehension of their intention of attention.

If he is 78 and using AI to generate responses he is not declining in any significant way, the thing you may need to accept is not his decline but his withdrawal from you.

I think any satisfaction derived from either is simply from a feeling of good maintenance and is unremarkable and the fact you have indeed remarked upon it suggests you only wish to draw attention to your anatomy like a floozy.

The more general thing is that all love relationships are unrequited to a degree. The unrequitedness is on a sliding scale from examples conventionally described as unrequited to anything where there is an asymmetry in the love which is most cases. Usually one partner will love the other more and I think this is by evolved design, it means that in significant disagreements the one that loves more will back down as they fear the loss of the relationship more. Unevenness of the shared love will allow the bond to maintain itself when more equally bonded partnerships would have broken.

It is not very complex, both are generalist reference terms, shit can be a neutral referrer or have negative connotations and dope can be neutral or have positive connotations. So your two phrases decant to this referred to thing is a good thing and this referred to thing is a bad thing.

Why a quarter

The term slop isn’t helpful, all game environments are generated and realtime bespoke generation is certainly the future. AI will penetrate every niche as if the world was its first slightly fat girlfriend and so it is a safe bet it will commandeer resources like its freshers’ week.