• 0 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle













  • You mean to say that people on this site are claiming that individuals with publicly stated agendas and goals might possibly use the fiscal and/or reputational benefits of the organisations they control to aid in the furthering of whatever goals/agendas they may have?

    Point me in their direction, i shall have words…big ones…like wherewithal …or extrapolation…prestidigitation…etc.

    Clearly these people are buttering their toast with a teaspoon, seems like an incredible leap to me and i bet they couldn’t even provide a single example of this happening in the modern day…illogical plebeians.

    Edit : more salt that I’d expect for zero actual counters


  • i’m of the opinion that if someone has done their best* [1] to consider the consequences of an approach and chooses to take that approach while accepting the potential outcomes, then that is an acceptable decision making process.

    In some cases escalation might be a potential outcome and as long as the person understands that, then them choosing that option is their considered choice.

    In the same way that freedom of speech* [2] isn’t freedom from consequences, freedom of choice isn’t freedom from other peoples choosing to act against you.

    If you want to make what seems like a poor choice from my point of view, i might advise against it, but ultimately it’s up to you.

    However, i’m also free to try and stop you if that’s what i choose. In this case i’m not looking to curtail your choices, but i am pitting my choice against yours.


    1. a good faith best effort, considering the circumstances ↩︎

    2. the general idea not the US specific thing ↩︎