Red meat has a huge carbon footprint because cattle requires a large amount of land and water.

https://sph.tulane.edu/climate-and-food-environmental-impact-beef-consumption

Demand for steaks and burgers is the primary driver of Deforestation:

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-beef-industry-fueling-amazon-rainforest-destruction-deforestation/

https://e360.yale.edu/features/marcel-gomes-interview

https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2023-06-02/almost-a-billion-trees-felled-to-feed-appetite-for-brazilian-beef

If you don’t have a car and rarely eat red meat, you are doing GREAT 🙌🙌 🙌

Sure, you can drink tap water instead of plastic water. You can switch to Tea. You can travel by train. You can use Linux instead of Windows AI’s crap. Those are great ideas. But, don’t drive yourself crazy. If you are only an ordinary citizen, remember that perfect is the enemy of good.

  • Senal@programming.devEnglish
    31·
    6 months ago

    I would assume a competently executed strategy of eliminating the worst offenders (and/or the managing infrastructure thereof) would probably have more impact, they probably meant legal things though.

    For instance, a solo campaign of taking out the biggest data centers would probably work. Difficult though.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      1·
      6 months ago

      For agriculture at least, the differences are often quite categorical. The best cast production will not get you the same differences as reducing meat consumption

      Plant-based foods have a significantly smaller footprint on the environment than animal-based foods. Even the least sustainable vegetables and cereals cause less environmental harm than the lowest impact meat and dairy products [9].

      https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/8/1614/html

      It’s an even larger difference than eliminating all food waste (which we should also work to reduce)

      we show that plant-based replacements for each of the major animal categories in the United States (beef, pork, dairy, poultry, and eggs) can produce twofold to 20-fold more nutritionally similar food per unit cropland. Replacing all animal-based items with plant-based replacement diets can add enough food to feed 350 million additional people, more than the expected benefits of eliminating all supply chain food loss.

      https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1713820115

      • Senal@programming.devEnglish
        11·
        6 months ago

        If you’ll notice I mention the biggest offenders and/or the the underlying management infrastructure.

        Private jet owners getting systematically luigi’d would also fall under that remit, I was just using data centres as an example.

        Oil rigs, Nestlé, blackrock etc would also all work , with varying degrees of efficacy and difficulty.

        To address your argument directly, before you get all preachy think of the actual consequences of major data centres going down, all the critical infrastructure running on said data centres would also go down.

        That’s air traffic control, shipping and logistics ,and yes, agriculture; any system relying on cloud services running in those data centres

        If you pick the right ones and do it properly (a competently executed strategy, if you will) then you could cripple most industries, with all the consequences that brings.