

What i can or can’t handle isn’t relevant or what im talking about…
I’m telling you it sounds ignorant and insensitive
What i can or can’t handle isn’t relevant or what im talking about…
I’m telling you it sounds ignorant and insensitive
True, but who asked for any of that? This post is venting about how the holidays remind them of abuse, not asking why the holidays exist. What’s supposed to be OP’s reaction?
“Oh, you’re right, I guess I’m dumb for being sad about holidays that only exist to sell cards. You’ve cured me!”
You’re just giving up? It’s easier to just admit you were wrong. Could that hurt?
You have to be trolling. This guy just perfectly explained why you’re mistaken on both exponential curves, and the subject at hand. Why on earth are you still asking for the function of a graph you yourself have stated it is impossible to determine?
Why so dramatic?
Throwing around misspelled, ableist insults won’t save you from the embarrassment you’ve created for yourself.
It astonishes you to learn that discussing exponential growth is a mathematical subject?
Was the ellipsis indicative of your deep reasoning?
Well done at making a claim without any rationale. So proud. Now show how it’s done.
Youtube blocks any attempt to comment with links
Did you learn about linear algebra through chat GPT? WTF even is “fit a curve”? Who says that? No, there’s just not enough data to actually make that determination. There’s barely any information on the Y axis, and the resolution of both axes is too low to make a precise reading of their values. You can only estimate.
Yes, those are dots
You’re both discussing maths lmao
No, since you still seem to think it’s the same as linear
Not enough information for a meaningful answer
What exactly are you trying to do with this comment?
The uncertainty comes from reverse-engineering how a specific output relates to the prompt input. It uses extremely fuzzy logic to compute the answer to “What is the closest planet to the Sun?” We can’t know which nodes in the neural network were triggered or in what order, so we can’t precisely say how the answer was computed.
What exponential growth fundamentally is.
No, no, and no. Exponential growth is always exponential.
I’m not suggesting that, and it didn’t seem to me like OP was either