What is the decades of advice based on?

actually a study found that in a random blind test of 1000+ people 66% of the subjects had constipation symptoms lessen while 44% of the placebo group also saw symptoms reduced. this means fiber had an increased chance of relieving constipation.

Can you please give me the name of this study? Id like to actually read it

I’m not sure it’s marketing in the commercial sense, but it is yet another example of a emergent trend surfaced by poorly controlled epidemiology

https://hackertalks.com/post/20462821/12889208

If you read the guidelines this paper is referencing : https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/10490/chapter/9 You will see that fibre is not a essential nutrient, rather it ameliorates the effects of poor food/nutrition. I highly recommend reading the guideline directly, it is fascinating, especially the physiological effects section

The guideline is based heavily on epidemiology, in fact the only RCT on fibre consumption I’m aware of shows fibre is a causal factor in constipation : https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4593

If your eating whole foods, adding fibre isn’t going to do much for you because your food is nutritious. If your eating food that is bad for you, fibre is going to help because it reduces the amount of bad food you absorb… but my take away from this would be to avoid eating the bad food entirely

The one compelling benefit i’ve seen argued is that fibre is broken down into SCAs in intestines which is good for health, but this can also be achieved by eating low carb, intermittent fasting, etc.

this trial is bullshit.

Please provide the randomized trail showing the benefit of fibre with hard end points, where they also included a zero fibre arm

Simple poc test. Turn off your iphone, get a new iphone. Sign into icloud, can you access your images without manually typing in a key?

If not… The it’s probably e2e

Factorio 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rACCZaBcq1g

You might want to consider doing a ketogenic lifestyle. There is lots of emerging research on the metabolism mind connection, and specificity about mental health. Not eating glucose raising foods doesn’t hurt you, and it can have a marked improvement on brain health.

Actually it’s used in everything, it’s available, it’s well studied, it’s cheap, and most importantly it grows fast in a lab, so it’s easy to work with…

I wish I was joking, but lots of in vitro human research is done on the poor women’s cancer cells when the research has nothing to do with cancer, it’s quite the confounder

There are some unifying theories of cancer that do kinda make it into one thing: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00043

I.e. the Warburg effect, and damaged mitochondria being st the root of all cancers.

In your example the flu is not just one thing either, it’s a group of viruses that broadly have the same symptoms

Your philosophy is antithetical to existence.

Being alive kills other things, nature is competition. From bacteria and viruses in your body constantly being killed, to animals in the food supply (even veggies and croplands have pest control), just living in a safe community relies on the killing of other life: removing dangerous animals from the community, keeping pests out of food stores, keeping the water clean (kills water based life)

The phone you are using is at the end of a very complicated supply chain that mines resources from the earth, which requires killing animals… Moving resources across the earth, which requires killing animals (fish hit by boats, animals run over by cars, birds hit by trucks, pest control in all the production and storage facilities), etc.

When we maintain fasting for 5+ days we have a fairly large bump in autophagy, a state where the body kills off and recycles damaged cells. This state can cause some types of cancer to be more obvious to our immune systems and allow the tumor to be attacked. In some cases otherwise inoperable tumors can be removed after shrinking them through fasting.

Cancer cells can’t metabolize fat, when your fasting and in ketosis your body is only supplying fat and the cancer has nothing to eat (mostly, there is some glucose produced as a baseline)

I.E. fasting slows down the cancer energy rate so that the immune system can start catching up.

This is why the press-pulse cancer protocol uses deep ketosis and fasting in addition to supreasing the bodies glucose production. I.e. never adding external sugar into the body at all during treatment.

There is debate on that. There is a mitochondrial model of cancer that unifies cancer into a single mechanic. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00043

This is different from the common somatic mutation theory which views cancer as a bad generic mutation of human DNA

Niche communities have some growing pains here, but I’m hopeful we will get critical mass… one day

FWIW the zero-carb / carnivore communities don’t hate vegans; Nothing about being metabolically healthy requires us to hate on people who choose a different path. The issue is that one group has made their entire identity about what other people eat and proselytizing… so they see the fact zero carb diets work as a personal attack and react… even though it isn’t about them at all.

Thanks for the ping. The more the merrier!

It’s a fairly niche area so keeping the content coming will be a challenge, but I am hopeful these new mods can make it happen.

I’m trying to keep the content coming!

I feel like I’m posting alot!

Ground beef and eggs can be quite reasonable when purchased in bulk from wholesale sources! Keeps my cost down

From watching the video the ROE appears to allow for engagement for crossing the blue line onto federal property or interfering with traffic leaving the compound.