I’m 20 and probably wouldn’t date anyone over 39 or under 18-19. If i date someone who is 18, they also can’t be barely 18, they have to have been 18 for a while so birthday is important if they’re 18.

my current girlfriend is 19 x3

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    [Error] to [Error]

    (Don’t want a relationship. I’ve seen first hand how my parents are miserable with each other, not looking forward to that shit)

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Whatever-whatever. I don’t have any strict age limit, if you care to make your case I’ll listen. I’m not that busy.

    That being said I do have the most in common with women in their 30s, being in my 30s myself

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In theory maybe 10 years in either direction (I’m old) but in practice I’ve only had long term relationships with guys within a couple years of my age.

    Lovers between times, for whatever reason I always ended up with younger guys, that seemed to be the people into me, but still never more than 10 years difference.

    When I was your age? One or two years at most. Absolutely not anyone much older or younger, no.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      @HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world body has been discovered behind a Wendy’s near a dumpster with a card board sign

      single like a dollar bill, have it for free!

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I’m 9 years older than my kid sister. We had an agreement, she doesn’t date anyone older than me and I don’t date anyone younger than her.

    We both married people in that range.

    Internet Creepieness Rule:

    Your age / 2 + 7 is the low end limit.

    • Athon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This.

      I strayed from this formula by 1 year once (I was 38, she was 25), and there was this strange generational gap where we just had completely different interests, we didn’t get each others’ references, and things fizzled pretty quickly.

      Anyone else I’ve dated has been within this formula and we’ve gotten a long quite well. If they’re below this number for you, or you’re below this number for them, even by a little bit, it’ll get weird and you’ll run out of things to talk about pretty quickly.

      • TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m 38 and can’t imagine dating a 26 year old. The woman I’m currently seeing is my same age and it’s great.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That is a strange way to say she’s 57…

    But anyway! Range varies wildly with age. 6 years is something you at least ponder at age 25, but will feel like “same age” around 50.

    My feeling based on what people seem to at least not care to even gossip lightly about: max 1 year at age 15. 5 years at 40. 10 years at age 60+.

    Wider ranges are not problematic, but gets into at least “interesting to talk about”. E.g. “They are 33 and 40! Huh! Good for them.”

  • Meltdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It depends entirely on the person. Some people are intelligent, self possessed adults by the time they’re 20, other people are immature shitbags well into their old age. Age is a poor metric for evaluating compatibility.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Hypothetically, I don’t have a limit st the high end, and the low end would be based more on the individual, but no younger than eighteen.

    In reality, chances of finding someone in their twenties that would mesh well with for dating is unlikely, so thirty-ish is a more realistic lower age.

    Upper end is less restricted for dating, but on a realistic level, I’m not going to enter a relationship with someone that’s into their seventies just because of life span probability after that.

    Luckily, I’m happily married, so I don’t have to worry about that shit. But I’ve never cared about ages for dating, since dating is essentially “trying on” someone for a more committed relationship. It makes it worth interacting with people that are less likely to be compatible on a surface level, when going into it with the knowledge that it’s probably going to peter out anyway, so the risks of it having a high price are lower.

    Seriously, every relationship has difficulties. You can’t predict what’s going to arise over decades of being together. So limiting options by age ends up being arbitrary. While I never went looking for people far away from my age, anyone old enough and developed enough to understand what a relationship is was the determinant.

    Now, on a practical level, once you’re out in the work force, chances are that you’ll be interacting with people from their mid-to-late twenties up to their sixties. So you aren’t going to end up dating outside of that range often. To date someone you have to meet them, and communicate often enough to ask them for time outside of whatever scope you meet them in. So I never really dated outside that range at any point. But I wouldn’t have rejected the possibility if it came up.

    I dunno, I just don’t see age gaps as a problem.

  • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If I were to date at the age of 42, I would not date anyone below the age of 39 or above the age of 46. I would prefer only a 4-year gap in either direction, as the number 4 feels right (very vibes and personal preference based reasoning).