Hi folks! I’m here with another idea. Let’s make an amazon alternative. I know! I know! That was asked for a couple times already but lets discuss some details.

Amazon is basically glorified dropshipping by now. What if we just made federated (not sure if over activitypub would work) ads and sales, powered by fediseer (the “trust” network of the fediverse).

Example 1: So you buy at toms groceries, you trust them. they have experience with tina’s hardware store and they trust them. so you can buy both toms and tinas wares on both sites.

Example 2: So for example, I run a small business that sells computers. You run a small business that sells mice and keyboards. I have worked with you before so I mark you as trusted in my local website, which federates with yours, showing your products in my shop. If a customer buys my computer and buys your keyboard on top, my site sends you a buy order with customer address and payment. I get a small fee for my electricity of say 1%.

Can someone try and poke holes in this idea? It feels like this could work!

Have a nice weekend.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Decentralized sales platforms would just suck to use, in general. The Amazon problem is likely something that can only be solved by the legislative processes of the countries it operates in.

    Imagine Ebay but with even less scam prevention.

  • ericjmorey@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You don’t seem to understand the retail operations of Amazon. They provide logistics and marketing services to retailers, they also directly compete against those retailers because those retailers can’t do better at logistics and marketing without using Amazon’s services.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I really don’t see the appeal of activity-pub for this.

    It’s a protocol used for social media and interactions. You describe just sort of a “metastore”.

    Maybe a review store site could work better with activity pub.

    • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reading the post, I found what I really want right now: a federated review platform. Too many times I want to look for a product, and has to look into a reddit thread to see a recommendation. There should be one, right? Where is it?

      • Balder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        If it involves money, it has the incentive to game the system. So each instance would be dealing with multiple attempts from actors adding fake reviews, sabotaging competitors, endless spam etc. If it can be easily automated, the service would be 24/7 filled with AI spam and drive away all users, defeating the purpose entirely.

        The only trustworthy reviews are from people who actually bought the product in the website, because then it has a negative incentive to spend that much money for one fake review.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know that Federation is exciting, but all these ideas for federated services are really missing the reason why the Fediverse’s current bits are successful - because they have low moral hazard.

    When you get into economics and meatspace relationships, moral hazard skyrockets.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Accepting payments and creating “contracts” over the Fediverse is no bueno at the current time. I think it would require some kind of 3rd party, almost PayPal-esque (PayPal has its own controversy) service that would create the obligation and associated penalties that come with an online transaction. Could be the instance itself but as you said that’s a risk most instance owners wouldn’t take.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      That is a very good point! Thank you! I figured someone would find a constructive way to argue why something might be better than something else and you are that person. This would kind of speak to the idea of crypto which I dont really like on first sight but it would at least give the ability to audit, right?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Crypto doesn’t really solve any of the problems that a payment processor wouldn’t also solve, unfortunately.

  • iltg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    you are not proposing a federated amazon, this is just federated ads and/or reviews.

    how to process payments? how to ship goods? how to handle refunds? how to handle contestations?

    please you can’t just make anything federated. this protocol is built for social media and struggles to take over that sphere, we should focus on one thing rather than throwing random stuff at the wall hoping it sticks (cough federated tik tok cough)

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      how to ship goods?

      Part of their point was that Amazon doesn’t handle shipping for a lot of the things they sell. If you want to, they can store everything within their massively-optimized operation and ship it for you for a small-enough-to-be-compelling fee, but you don’t have to. You can also just list your stuff there and ship it to customers when they order it.

      how to process payments?

      This is trivial. The modern financial internet makes it extremely easy.

      how to handle refunds? how to handle contestations?

      This is a fair point, probably the biggest issue that could be a stumbling block. One fair counterpoint is that Amazon’s handling of these situations is often pure uncaring dogshit, so if you’re doing a bad job at it, you’re still no different than Amazon (and potentially better than, since it is hard to see how someone could be any worse.)

      It’s not totally simple, and you have to do some real actual work to solve it, but it’s also not like going to the moon. It’s solvable.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Considering your answer to payments solution was "This is trivial.’ it sounds like a) You’ve never run a business and b) you’re more interested in fantasizing than a realistic conversation.

        • Balder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          All of this talk is actually ignoring the very fundamental aspect of this sort of transaction: trust.

          When you buy from a place, you do it because you trust the store or the service to handle problems [1]. I remember one saying that a purchase is actually a very intimate relationship, and if you have any reason to think that person or service would screw up over, you’d never engage in any monetary transactions with them.

          A marketplace where anyone can sell only works because despite your diligence to look for reputable sellers, the platform usually offers some assurance that you’ll be refunded for any type of scam, which means they take on the burden of doing some quality control on approving sellers. At least that’s how it works in Brazil, I suppose that a country with a high societal trust might have less of this problem, but the incentives are the heart of any system.

          [1] Sure, sometimes it doesn’t go the way you wanted it and you can end up being screwed by the service, but the expectation was there.