Misleading pricing:

Using the billing period as the header and showing the price for the billing period… except for monthly—which shows 1/4 the price and says “every week” in smaller, gray text.

Punishing non-subscription payments:

Adding a $6.50 (1400%) surcharge for wanting a weekly one-time payment instead of a recurring subscription.

Charging more for longer periods:

Monthly billing, once you remove the dark pattern and convert it to its actual price, is $2. There are 12 months in a year, meaning it would cost $24 to maintain that subscription for a year.

Why is the yearly subscription $29, then?


If you want to verify this for yourself, you’re going to need to clear your cookies and reload an article a lot. They do A/B tests and show different subscription requied modals. This one was the worst.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    I loaded a bunch of articles until it prompted me to pay. I got the screenshot below. In my opinion, this is an intentionally misleading fake 50c/month offer.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fuck is ‘core’ and ‘premium’??
      Will they deliver the news all he way to my device e ery morning if I get premium?
      The $2-3 subscription wouldn’t be unreasonable, but I’d rather give it to an outlet that doesn’t try to mislead me even before I become their customer.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Premium includes the stories that are critical of Amazon and billionaires, which Bezos usually has pulled from circulation.

        /s