• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Commands, as in “has the responsibility for”.

    Not “owns and can do whatever the fuck they want with it and be a dumbass asshole to everyone”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Various Star Fleet officers have periodically violated Federation rules and guidelines to achieve some ideological goal or moral imperative that cuts across the fleet’s stated mission. Like with anything there’s limits - Starfleet has its own police, crews can mutiny, eventually you run out of dilithium to gas up your warp drive so you can’t go rogue forever. But for a deep space galaxy class vessel, they’re regularly stuck making their own decisions under a military autocracy.

      The Starfleet Admiralty Problem is a chronic plotline in the series, with admirals routinely engaged in all sorts of corrupt practices and villainous endeavors. Every captain from Kirk to Freeman has to deal with their share of higher ranking officers fucking around and being dumb assholes. Hell, Kirk himself is demoted from Admiral to Captain for going rogue in The Voyage Home.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes this is called individual freedom. And people are apt to serve their own interests occasionally. The overall point is that there are consequences to those actions. And every one of those rogue admirals discovered what those consequences were. None of them got off scot-free to ride off into the distance with their ill-gotten gains.