Is there some hidden pronounciation rule I’m not aware of? And why do we say F.B.I and not FBI or U.S.B and not USB ?

I know it seems a really silly question seeing the actual situation with the ICE eveywhere on the news… But this really bothers me on why people yell ICE when it’s actually the I.C.E :/.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If an acronym is convenient, it will overrule an initialism.

    You seem to be insisting on avoiding the acronym that is right there, and I’m not sure why.

  • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    17 hours ago

    NASA, NATO, Radar, Sonar, Laser, Scuba, AIDS, PIN, SWAT, YOLO, CAD

    The rule genuinely is “if it can be said as a word, it might be said as a word”.

    They’re called acronyms.

    BBC, TV, USSR etc. can’t easily be said as a word - these are just initialisations.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Okay I get that ! But in the case of the ICE both are actually acceptable.

      I.C.E sounds good so those ICE. I guess in this context as some else said, it’s because they are “ice cold” (in this context).

      Would it be acceptable in a conversation to talk about the I.C.E ?

      • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Would it be acceptable in a conversation to talk about the I.C.E ?

        I don’t see anybody getting thrown out of the house for daring to spell out an acronym that is usually pronounced as a word. What kind of people do you hang out with? It might cause confusion but context normally helps.

        If you were speaking of I.C.E. to me I’d punch you in the face. Also if you referred to them as ICE. That’s because I refer to them, correctly, as the SS.

        • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Hummm

          If you were speaking of I.C.E. to me I’d punch you in the face.

          Why? This is kinda the opposite you said just above

          I don’t see anybody getting thrown out of the house for daring to spell out an acronym that is usually pronounced as a word.

          :/

  • Tahl_eN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    As far as I’m aware, the rule is “if it can easily be pronounced, it should be pronounced. If it can’t, fall back to spelling it.” For example, if it was the Federal Investigation Bureau, we would probably call it the Fib, barring some major marketing campaign to prevent that.

  • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Acronyms vs Initialisms

    No one is going to try pronounce Fbi, it’s awkward.

    There are terms that bridge the Acronym/Initialism divide. SQL-Sequel, URL-Earl and GUI-Gooey are some that come up fairly regularly in my line of work.

    The bottom line is; Language is used to communicate concepts. We are lazy and do it as efficiently as we can get away with. The rules have changed a LOT to get us where we are today. It would be blind hubris to think the change will stop just because we don’t like it.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    FBI and USB aren’t words, ICE is.

    POTUS isn’t actually a word, but it’s often pronounced that way.

    The Depot of Transportation is often reduced to DOT.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      ICE=Immigration and Customs Enforcement

      FBI=Federal Bureau of Investigation

      USB=Universal Serial Bus

      None of those are words :/ but an acronym.

      • 474D@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Perhaps you should read twice before you try to correct someone.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Did you know that acronyms are types of words?

        And many modern words are elisions and concatenations of words we no longer use.

        Where do you stand on OK, where it’s actually a word, or laser and modem which are nouns with specific meanings even though they were derived originally?

        What about coke instead of coca cola, cocaine and compressed coal?

        • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah but modem is different. It’s a contraction of 2 words (modulation/demodulation) that’s not the same as an acronym.

  • Jeeve65@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because it is a word, or it’s easier to say, or funnier.

    It’s definitely not the only case. NATO comes to mind, or GOAT, NIMBY. Yesterday I heard someone say (in a tv series episode) ‘fudney’ for FDNY

    What it ‘actually’ is does not matter.

    It’s ICE, as in: cold as

    • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeaah ice (water in solid state) does indeed is a word ! But the I.C.E isn’t !

      I do get that we are very lazy, and it does sound better… but without context it seems like people are protesting against ice (solid water) which seems silly.

        • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Not only without context… From the perspective of people not aware of.

          Someone who knows about what ice is (solid water) this is very confusing if they don’t know about the I.C.E?

          • NABDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Briefly mildly confusing maybe. Not very confusing unless you’re already pretty confused about everything.

            How are people hearing I.C.E. referred to as ICE without any context?

            I don’t think anyone is confused into thinking that frozen water is racist or murdering people indiscriminately.

            Or are you saying that someone said “I hate ICE”, and you thought they were talking about frozen water? Admittedly, if it was blurted out as a non sequitur with no other information it might be briefly misunderstood. Also, given the storm that hammered the U.S. recently, folks here could easily be talking about frozen water.

            But all you have to do is ask for clarification.

      • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Maybe this is some sarcasme… But why then follow rules if we can just say things how we prefer? GIF or JIF?

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Because rules of language are not laws and are under no obligation to be consistent and/or make sense.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Er, aren’t you disproving your own point there?

          There’s two ways GIF can be pronounced, so we use both.

          Beats having to say “Graphical Interchange Format” or spelling it out every time we want to communicate with someone.

          The goal is to condense meaning as much as possible without losing the original context.

          Although with some acronyms, it actually takes longer to pronounce the acronym than spell it out, and we still pronounce it because of vocal flow (easier for the mouth to string those shapes together).

          • N0x0n@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Not disproving, just making context on how confusing it can be if there isn’t proper rules to follow :/

            • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Welcome to the English language, where there are two sets of rules to follow (Germanic and Latin) and social linguistic development often eschews both.