Say, let’s admit consciousness is the result of a physical process.

Then say this process only goes “forward” when our time coordinate increases. Just like an egg gets cooked when it’s temperature coordinate increases, but it doesn’t get more or less cooked when it’s temperature coordinate decreases.

This would mean that going back in time doesn’t result in any perceptible change, since your consciousness hasn’t evolved from it’s “former” state.

Thus making it possible for us to be travelling through plenty of dimensions in varied directions, only ever experiencing the brief times when you happen to be moving in increasing time. Or whatever combination of movement along varied dimensions makes it possible for you to be conscious.

TLDR: i need to take shorter showers

  • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Consciousness can never be the subject of science since it cannot be measured. It’s all conjecture and metaphysics

    Notice that I said this is a very active topic in academic philosophy (not science). I literally sent you links to what professional metaphysicians have to say on this topic. Do you really think you can contribute more to this topic in one lemmy comment than experts who have studied this problem for their entire careers?

    it cannot be measure

    This is exactly one of the reasons why it poses a problem. Physical things can be measured but consciousness can’t.

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      So what’s the point of saying AI can’t be conscious? That’s where we started here. It’s a stupid argument that’s clearly wrong.

      • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        I’m not discussing whether AI could be conscious. I’m responding to your claim that consciousness must be a physical phenomenon, which is a separate issue.