If you have assets in a bank, stock market, investment platform, 401(k) or other pension then there are a number of risks that threaten not only the existence of those funds but your access to them.

First of all, don’t expect to hold onto them unless you go along with the government’s game of Simon says. For example, there is a good chance that you will be forced to get digital ID to access these in the future.

Vietnam is an example of what is likely to come soon, where biometrics were made mandatory to access all bank accounts. The 86 million accounts which weren’t biometrically verified were frozen and are now being closed. Transfers equivalent to around $390 or more also require biometric verification.

Many in the western world have also had their bank accounts frozen or closed for perfectly legal political views. And now when you move or withdraw money you may be asked what the purpose is and the bank may deny your request if they don’t like your answer (just one example). Banks are also required to report anything deemed suspicious to the government.

If such restrictions can be applied to bank accounts, there’s no reason why they can’t be applied to accounts at stock exchanges and accounts with 401(k) and pension providers.

In Hungary and Poland, all private pensions were seized by the government and nationalized, leading many to accuse the government of stealing their pensions. Existing state pensions aren’t safe either, as they are often considered unsustainable due to unchecked government spending and aging populations.

Banks and pension providers can also fail, as we saw in 2023, and US banks have continued to fail every year since then. While on paper there are often guarantees to cover such events, these usually only cover up to a certain amount, and these may not be honored during a financial crisis.

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’m curious, what is your alternative here?

    If you say crypto, I’ll say lol. If you say under your mattress I’ll lmao. If you say physical gold, I’ll chuckle subtly.

    In this world there aren’t perfect answers. You do the best with what you’re dealt.

    • StopTech@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      This post wasn’t about recommendations, just information that people should know. Make your own decisions based on your own assessment of the risks and likely returns associated with each option. I’d say precious metals in your physical possession are a simple option with low risk but that’s my opinion.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The imperfect answer is to diversify. If you think there is a real risk that you get screwed by the organizations you are trusting your money with, keeping some portion of your wealth in any of those things you are ridiculing is a rational choice to hedge against that risk.

      Those are all also risky, but the risks are different as they are (mostly) about your personal security rather than trustworthiness of institutions, meaning you have a lot more protection from being completely wiped out in a single event.

      • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Yupp this guy is right. I’d also say you should consider (OP) that Gold specifically tends to do better when the US dollar is doing bad.

        And now that US and Isreal is hellbent on starting a world war I’d say that’s a pretty safe bet to have some gold and silver around.