• unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That is a weird way of saying “Humans are bigger than birds,” even then though, I think on average the ostrich will win.

    Edit: I missed the flying part, but still.

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      And you missed the part about conserving mass. A bird that can fly, with the mass of a human, would be much bigger than a human (cause birds have very thin, hollow bones).

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        You seem to be describing density (d = m/v). Preserving mass doesn’t really mean anything in this context without a discussion of volume.

        • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          why would you assume density would be conserved? all I said was mass so the density would absolutely be variable.

          • unmagical@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            why would you assume density would be conserved?

            I didn’t. I pointed out that the person I replied was not describing mass.