Whenever I talk to any Democrat supporters, they by-default cheer their Presidents and then I’ve to remind them of their leader’s illegal wars and war crimes. They condemn those acts and they go back to their cheerleading role - Why do they keep forgetting atrocities committed by their leaders? Why do they accept war criminals as their leader?

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t think Harris would have bombed Iran.

    But hey, it is better to do something that feels good than something which affects change, right?

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There was already an economic war on Iran, which was already killing people and destabilizing their government. Harris would have waited a few more years for the economic war to collapse Iran’s government and turn it into a situation similar to Syria, and only then would have started bombing. By then, Iran might not have been able to exert control over traffic through Hormuz.

      Harris would have been a better manager of the empire. Instead, we got Trump, who is on track to lose to Iran.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think you know what that means.

          Accelerationism would mean voting for Harris because she’d be a better manager of the empire.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No. Wanting Trump to win is accelerationist because he’s going to cause the empire to fall faster due to incompetence.

            You aren’t angry at Democrats for war crimes, you’re angry at them because they are better at governing.