This would stop the currently exponential pace of growth from outpacing what society, and regulation, can adapt to. Thus avoiding the inevitable crash that will happen when we lose control of the exponentially accelerating train of technology, and it flies off the rails.

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    We’re trying pretty hard to slow down EV and green energy adoption as much as possible in my country, that count?

    But seriously, in an ideal world this would be the role of taxes. Technology running out of control and harming people or the planet because too many people are making too much money off it? Tax 'em until its no longer worth their while to behave in those ways.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We’re trying pretty hard to slow down EV and green energy adoption as much as possible in my country, that count?

      Well, on the one hand, we’re trying some very heavy-handed bureaucratic strategies to prop up O&G and to undermine domestic green alternatives.

      But, on the other hand, we’re fucking up all the major international suppliers of O&G while incentivizing the world’s manufacturing powerhouse to spam green energy grids across the underdeveloped world at below-cost in order to build out a 21st century trade network.

      So it’s a double-edged sword, and we’re just pinwheeling around with that thing.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yep, apparently Cuba is undergoing the fastest green energy transition of any nation in history thanks to our fuckery, so this sword probably has like 8 edges at least.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Taxes are one mechanism, but they don’t work if you let corporations get too big/powerful. Then you get regulatory capture, no matter how many anti corruption measures you bake in

      Capitalism needs constant pruning to incentivize competition and align companies with the common good… And even that never seems to last very long

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Very true, and that’s the reason why governments being “pro-business” (as opposed to “anti-trust”) is just pouring gas on the fires of inequity. Governments are supposed to regulate, tax, and incentivize businesses to act in a way that benefits the country overall, something we seem to have totally lost sight of in the USA decades ago.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      this. taxes and regulation are part of a healthy economy. Its like excersising and eathing right. we have been a idle junk food eating economy for a long time now.