• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Thank you so much for highlighting a hypothetical problem which only exists in your head. Seems like screeching about anything LLM related has now become the entire identity for some people. Really should find a new hobby.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Automation is very obviously not inherently anti-labor. The way automation is used under capitalism is, but I didn’t really expect any deep intellectual insights from you.

            • ultimate_worrier@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 minutes ago

              Not inherently

              until you look around and see that automation eliminates large swaths of the workforce exactly 100% of the time…. over multiple centuries and counting.

              Don’t worry. We’ll soon face the consequences of the dystopian hellscape you’re so tirelessly advocating for.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 minutes ago

                First of all, that’s obviously false. Second of all, go look at unemployment rates in USSR. You literally have no clue regarding the subject you’re attempting to debate here. However, even your whole premise is insane. We shouldn’t strive to do work for the sake of work. Automating toil away so people can spend their lives in a self directed fashion is unarguably a good thing. You’re just arguing for having what David Graeber called bullshit jobs here.